Civility 101

Published: November 30, 2010

By Jim Lichtman
Image
Read More

In light of my excess last week regarding political pundit Keith OIbermann, I’ve been spending a little more time reading up on civility.

According to an excellent little volume, Choosing Civility, by P.M. Forni, “Civility’s defining characteristic is its ties to city and society.

“The word derives from the Latin civitas, which means ‘city,’ especially in the sense of civic community. Civitas is the same word from which civilization comes. The age-old assumption behind civility is that life in the city has a civilizing effect. The city is where we enlighten our intellect and refine our social skills. And as we are shaped by the city, we learn to give of ourselves for the sake of the city. Although we can describe the civil as courteous, polite and well mannered, etymology reminds us that they are also supposed to be good citizens and good neighbors.”

In Michael Josephson’s Six Pillars of Character, civility falls under the ethical value of respect.

“People are not things,” writes Josephson, “and everyone has a right to be treated with dignity. We certainly have no ethical duty to hold all people in high esteem, but we should treat everyone with respect, regardless of who they are and what they have done. We have a responsibility to be the best we can be in all situations, even when dealing with unpleasant people.”

Are you listening, Jim?

“A respectful person is an attentive listener…”

Well, okay, but what about…

“…although his patience with the boorish need not be endless (respect works both ways).”

It sure does. But when I hear things that violate respect for society, I feel…

“Nevertheless, the respectful person treats others with consideration, and doesn’t resort to intimidation, coercion or violence except in extraordinary and limited situations to defend others, teach discipline, maintain order or achieve social justice. Punishment is used in moderation and only to advance important social goals and purposes.”

Clearly the lesson for me is self-restraint.  Speak out, when necessary, but in a way that demonstrates respect for the individual as well as society, as a whole.

In a 1792 letter to George Hammond, Thomas Jefferson writes, “A nation, as a society, forms a moral person, and every member of it is personally responsible for his society.”

Comments

Leave a Comment



Read More Articles
The Latest... And Sometimes Greatest
Who We Were. Who We Are…
Today, America is 250 years old. This Fourth of July, amid deep national division, it seems worth asking a simple question: Which of our country’s...
July 4, 2026
Are We Still Worthy of What They Declared?
Conclusion: The Words That Made Us and Still Must.  In December of 1776, the Revolution was not moving toward triumph. It was close to collapse....
July 3, 2026
Are We Still Worthy of What They Declared?
Part 2: Common Sense Are we still capable of that kind of clarity when it matters most? There was a moment in the birth of...
July 1, 2026
Are We Still Worthy of What They Declared?
For the most part, my high school history classes consisted of names, dates, documents, and battles. What I’ve learned since then — through historians like...
June 29, 2026
A Cautionary Tale: France Then, Washington Now
Lately, I’ve been reading more history, mostly to educate myself. But the other night, I opened Lord Acton’s Lectures on the French Revolution and didn’t...
June 25, 2026
Different Issues. Same Fear.
As our nation nears its 250th anniversary, an uneasy emotional connection to the past has returned—one rooted in fear, and the question of who gets...
June 22, 2026