Ethics Codes

Published: March 11, 2009

By Jim Lichtman
Image
Read More

While researching an organization, in preparation for a talk, I discovered that the group had a very strong ethics component in place.  In fact, a recent situation proved that ethics was not only taken seriously, but critical to the credibility of the organization.

This caused me to ask a very basic question:  “Why hire me to give a talk?”

Their answer:  “We need constant reminders!”

During the last several months, it seeems, we’ve been bombarded by an unrelenting number of ethics scandals.  From business to politics, religion to entertainment, our ethical infrastructure is in serious need of repair.

Many seem to feel that if we had more ethics codes, things would be very much different.  This makes ethics teacher Michael Josephson’s recent commentary all the more important as well as timely.

“I’ve written dozens of codes for organizations, and have a healthy respect for their value as an element of corporate culture, but I wince at the unreasonable expectations attached to them.

“First of all, ethics codes don’t make people ethical. They don’t make bad people good. Nor do they make people with poor judgment wise. Ethics codes would not have prevented most of the bad behavior we’ve seen in recent years.

“You see, there are two aspects to ethics: Discernment – knowing right from wrong; and Discipline – having the moral willpower to do what’s right.

“A code defines what’s right and acceptable and imposes sanctions on those who don’t follow it. But unless a code reinforces an established ethical culture, it won’t do much to assure that people will do what’s right.

“It’s proper and prudent to clarify obligations under existing laws and to establish standards of conduct in areas not governed by law. In effect, ethics codes transform one perspective of a moral obligation into a binding rule.

“For example, it’s helpful to set clear parameters for using e-mail, private information, or company property; for hiring or doing business with relatives; and for accepting gratuities. In more complex cases, codes can mandate disclosure or certification and forbid or restrict transactions such as loans and reimbursements that could create real or apparent conflicts of interest.

“To the extent we need more clarity, we need more codes.  To the extent we need more character, we need a lot more.”

We need constant reminders.

Comments

  1. Author

    I would definitely agree that just because codes are in place it in no way means people will follow or apply them.

    I think history has proven that very thing. People do what they want and apply only what fits their needs at that time. Reminders in any context are only helpful if we follow them. People who take the reminders to heart are most likely already following the counsel or code; those who need the reminder most likely are not. Who says a reminder is going to change someone’s heart? If they weren’t doing it already what will get them to apply these reminders?

Leave a Comment



Read More Articles
The Latest... And Sometimes Greatest
Article II Clarified
Justice… begins with fairness. Not fairness for the powerful, or the people we happen to like. Fairness for everyone. CBS News 24/7 reporter Camilo Montoya-Galvez...
May 14, 2026
If It Looks Like a Duck…
Donald Trump has never hidden his disdain for anyone or any institution he believes stands in his way. Near the top of that list is...
May 11, 2026
A Tale of Two Voices
Two voices, both alike in reach and power, Speak into a divided world. One feeds grievance. The other calls for grace. Influence still carries power....
May 8, 2026
How Do We Manage Division?
Recently, I found myself returning to a question I’ve asked in different forms for years: what does it actually take to hold a country together...
May 5, 2026
The Supreme Court is Broken. How Do We Fix It?
As distilled from an email update from Michael Waldman, President and CEO of the Brennan Center for Justice. On Wednesday, the Supreme Court struck down...
May 1, 2026
Leadership as a Moral Act
Britain’s King Charles III spoke to a chamber that, for a moment, set aside party labels—Democrat and Republican—and listened not as factions, but as participants...
April 29, 2026