The Way Things Ought to Be

Published: October 6, 2010

By Jim Lichtman
Image
Read More

I don’t know about you, but I am sick and tired of the current process used to elect public officials.

Local, state, national, it makes no difference. The process is far too long, uses questionable “facts,” relies on negative campaigning and wastes too damn much money.

How much?  According to the U.K.s Guardian, the Obama presidential campaign, including the transition and inauguration spent close to $1 billion. If you Google search Senate, House and Governor Seats you’ll find a lot of out-of-whack numbers as well.

While this is the reality we live in, I don’t think we should settle for this. So, I’ve come up with a list of proposals to the process that, I believe, would bring a lot more clarity as well as sanity to the whole business of elections.

1. Each candidate running for President would be permitted to raise and spend no more than $75 million each. The only money spent on a given candidate must come directly from the campaign itself. Absolutely NO outside groups.

2. Each candidate gets 10 paid television commercials and 10 paid radio ads. If you can’t make your pitch to the voter over the course of 10, thirty-second ads how can you explain anything to people who spend much of their time preoccupied with Dancing with the Stars or Real Housewives of D.C.?

3. Every ad must submit to a fact-check 30-days in advance of broadcast. If it doesn’t check out, the ad gets tossed and you’ve lost one of your ten.

4. No personal, negative ads. Want to talk about the distinctions between which policies or legislation you support vs. your opponent, fine. All personal attacks are off limits, period.

5. The campaign season would be limited to the three months leading up to Election Day.

6. Each candidate for office must contribute to a generic, voter pamphlet sent out to all voters, at government expense, detailing their qualifications in clear and concise language that spells out exactly what they stand for and why.

7. Each candidate for office must be available for three televised debates that cover a range of issues obtained from surveys by voters as to what they, the voters, consider most important. The panel of questioners will be comprised of two journalists and one well-informed citizen.

8. After each debate, Politifact.com will fact-check each candidate, then compile a scorecard as to who got it right and who got it wrong.

9. A version of these same steps would apply to Senate and House races, as well as state and local officials.

10. Let the public decide who the best candidate is for the job and vote accordingly.

Perfect? Probably not.

My revisions would not stop pundits and others from saying anything they like about a candidate from either party. I may be naïve, but with trust in individuals and institutions at an all time low, what we need most is a Consumer Reports approach to navigate the maze of conflicting and derogatory information that bombards the voting public and separate what’s important from what is not.

We may have the right to vote our conscience, but as citizens, we have a responsibility to look beyond our own self-interests, and judge the issues and the individuals on the facts in the context of overall public good.

Comments, suggestions, fire away!

Comments

Leave a Comment



Read More Articles
The Latest... And Sometimes Greatest
Fear Is the Enemy Within, Not Each Other
Fed by misinformation and half-truths, fear pushes us to distrust others, retreat into ourselves, see threats where there are none. Fear convinces us the world...
October 16, 2024
When Was the Last Time Something Like This Happened in U.S. History?
In a public letter, 111 former top Republican officials have put aside party loyalty for the sake of national security and the future of our...
October 15, 2024
Is Truth Dead?
In the political landscape crafted by Donald Trump, “Truth is dead.” Trump’s domination of fear and panic squarely aimed at his supporters has not only...
October 14, 2024
Right v. Wrong
Here are some of the most recognizable figures who have worked with or opposed Donald Trump. Their quotes provide a firsthand look into why prominent...
October 11, 2024
Loyalty’s Reckoning
On Christmas Eve, 1974, John Dean, former counsel to President Richard Nixon, was sitting in Fort Holabird prison in Baltimore, Maryland, talking to a Mafia...
October 10, 2024
Trump/Nixon
Imagine if Watergate had been more than just a scandal. Imagine if Nixon got away with it. I don’t mean no one finds out; I...
October 8, 2024