In recent years, many news stories have come under fire for misrepresenting or distorting facts, fueling public skepticism about the credibility of mainstream reporting. While I write commentaries—not straight news—I strive to ensure that my opinions are firmly grounded in verifiable facts.

On June 7, I wrote a commentary titled A Day of Love—a Weekend of Force, reporting on the protests that took place in downtown Los Angeles. I based my observations on early reports and video footage that portrayed the events as largely peaceful, while suggesting that the National Guard was acting inappropriately toward protesters.

However, further evidence later revealed that some individuals were engaged in looting and throwing rocks at both police officers and guardsmen. One reader of this site pointed out–rightly–the inaccuracies in what I had written.

I wrote the piece while events were still unfolding, and I got the facts wrong.

That’s not an excuse. It’s an explanation.

In all my commentaries, I strive—first and foremost—to base my work on facts. I rely on a wide range of sources—both print and broadcast, across the political spectrum—to provide the most comprehensive and accurate picture possible. But in the heat of breaking events, even credible outlets and experienced writers can get it wrong. That day, I was one of them.

I should have waited for more verified facts before drawing conclusions. I take that responsibility seriously. Getting the story right matters. So does acknowledging when you don’t.

Since that incident, I’ve adopted a more deliberate approach. I now wait at least 24 hours—often longer—before writing about unfolding news. That pause allows time for more complete reporting and fewer assumptions. In the commentaries I’ve written since, I’ve redoubled my efforts to source the facts—linking directly to material whenever possible. Whether quoting or paraphrasing, my goal is always clarity, accuracy, and transparency. These are opinion pieces—but those opinions must be based on facts. That is the foundation.

Because I write about ethics, the values of fairness, honesty, and responsibility are vital. Fairness means more than balance—it requires a commitment to truth, the courage to be accountable, and the humility to admit when you’ve missed the mark. Honesty demands we say what is true, even when it’s uncomfortable. And responsibility means holding yourself to the standards you hold others to.

It’s not enough to express a view; it must be rooted in truth. That’s the standard I hold myself to—and the one I believe my readers deserve.