Searching for Our Better Angels

Published: October 20, 2025

By Jim Lichtman
Image
Read More

I’ve read and re-read Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address many times. Today, its words and meaning echo more loudly than ever.

“Both parties deprecated war; but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish.”
Lincoln refused to paint one side as righteous and the other as evil. He understood that both sides shared responsibility for the conflict. The struggle may look different today, but the spirit is the same: too many would rather see the other side lose than see the country heal.

“The prayers of both could not be answered; that of neither has been answered fully.”
Lincoln warned of the danger in believing God is always on our side. That same certainty haunts us now—when faith is twisted into politics and conviction becomes a weapon instead of a guide.

“With malice toward none; with charity for all; with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right…”
In a single sentence, Lincoln defined the moral balance we seem to have forgotten: the strength to care without surrendering principle, and the courage to stand firm without hatred. It wasn’t a call to surrender; it was a call to grace—to rise above anger, hatred and division.

“…to bind up the nation’s wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan…”
Lincoln reminded the country that reconciliation begins with empathy. In our time, when outrage drowns out compassion, understanding, that message is not history…it’s instruction.

Lincoln ended his address not with triumph, but with humility. He understood that victory without healing is hollow and that unity without forgiveness is impossible.

Lincoln’s appeal to the “better angels of our nature” was not a plea to political leaders. It was a call to the conscience of we the people. He knew democracy depends on something deeper than law—it depends on character. When integrity weakens, confidence falters; when decency fades, the space it leaves behind is quickly filled by doubt.

We’re testing that truth again. Every day, we hear voices insisting that loyalty belongs not to the Constitution, but to a man: that the press is the enemy, that courts are corrupt unless they rule a certain way, that those who disagree are not fellow citizens but enemies to be defeated.

So where are our better angels?

They’re not gone. They live in the people who still believe in service over self: the election worker who shows up after receiving threats, the journalist who keeps reporting facts in the face of smears, the public servant who tells the truth even when it costs them their job. These are the quiet acts of courage that preserve what shouting cannot destroy.

But they can’t do it alone. We need to re-learn how to listen, how to disagree without dehumanizing, how to defend truth even when it hurts our pride. Ethics doesn’t ask us to be perfect; it asks us to be honest—to hold ourselves accountable before we condemn others.

Lincoln believed that “the mystic chords of memory” would one day “swell the chorus of the Union.” Whether those chords sound again depends on us.

Our better angels aren’t gone. They’re waiting for us to remember who we are.

Comments

Leave a Comment



Read More Articles
The Latest... And Sometimes Greatest
When Democracy Comes Dressed as Patriotism
The current American political order is starting to feel like a collision between the films Seven Days in May and All the King’s Men. One...
June 18, 2026
Who Watches the Algorithm?
We are building machines that may soon judge, persuade, police, diagnose, hire, fire, and even help governments decide whom to trust. Yet we still have...
June 15, 2026
He Just Does His Job
I’ve been listening to and watching Democratic Senator Jon Ossoff of Georgia for more than a year now: his speeches, his questions in Senate hearings,...
June 11, 2026
Why Donald Trump Has Pulled Me Back In—Again
Last August, I wrote that I was “stepping back from the chaos” of Donald Trump. I meant to write about his presidency only when his...
June 8, 2026
Scott Pelley Responds
During a contentious staff meeting at 60 Minutes, Scott Pelley spoke out sharply, criticizing the judgment and decision-making of CBS News editor in chief Bari...
June 4, 2026
The Clock is Still Ticking. But Now It’s Ticking for CBS
I began watching 60 Minutes when it premiered on September 24, 1968, when Harry Reasoner and Mike Wallace introduced a new kind of television journalism:...
June 3, 2026