Published: March 28, 2014

By Jim Lichtman
Read More

Confession: I once cheated, big time, on a college Astronomy test, but I had several good reasons.

1. The text was over-the-top incomprehensible.

2. The teacher was over-the-top boring.

3. The class was held at 7:00 in the morning! (Mornings are notmy best time.)

Fortunately, I had a friend who was “over-the-top” crazy about astronomy. So, I had him take the mid-term for me. The class was so large the teacher never knew that he signed-in for me on test day. An hour later, I met with him to ask how it went.

“I don’t know, Jim,” he says. “That test was tough even for me.”

I don’t remember much of that class; I was too busy finishing a paper on integrity for a philosophy class.

I mention all this by way of prologue for a commentary written by friend and D.C. teacher, Colman McCarthy. A former columnist for The Washington Post, Colman teaches Peace Studies at Bethesda Chevy Chase High School.

McCarthy writes about asking his own students their opinions on cheating –

“Three months into the school year, with testing underway and homework being turned in, be assured that cheating is in full flow – at least if some of my high school and college students are any measure. During class time last year, I asked them to answer a question: If you have a chance to cheat on an exam and with no risk at all of being caught, what’s your choice? Write it down, anonymity guaranteed.

“First, some context.

“In 2012, the nation’s top cheating scandal was at Stuyvesant High School in New York City. This is a school where acing tests is all but second nature for the brainiacs. More than 70 students at the academically elite school were caught during their state Regents exams using cell phones and other new technologies to score the right answers.

“In June 2012, nearly 80 Air Force Academy cadets, taking a calculus test on their own time outside the classroom and unsupervised, were found to have cheated. They checked a website for the answers. The same year at Harvard University, some 70 cheaters were booted for cheating on a government course exam despite it being open book, open notes and open Internet.

“In 2011, 13 teenage venture capitalists at Great Neck North High School, on the Gold Coast of Long Island, were nabbed, cuffed and prosecuted for charging between $500 and $3,600 to take SAT and ACT exams on behalf of dimmer-bulb students. One of the impersonators told CBS News that he delivered ‘a perfect score on the math section’ for his customer. As the cash payments increased, so did this smarty’s cheating skills.

“In my classroom research, if we can call it that, I came upon two kinds of cheaters. The first group justified gaming the system because they felt the system was already gaming them.

–  ” ‘Yes, I would cheat on the test because I believe assessments are a waste of time and dumb.’

– ” ‘Yes I would so I could guarantee a good grade. It’s all about grades to get to college.’

– ” ‘I would cheat because a good grade is all that matters. Most of the things we are taught are not useful in real life anyway.’

– ” ‘Yes I would cheat. The entire grading system is centered on judging students based on how they take tests. It’s not fair. If the system wants you to get a good grade, the pressure of college, GPA and a career will cause students to crack, to cheat.’

– ” ‘Yes I would cheat. I know it’s wrong but I’ve been taught and raised in a result-based society. If I didn’t feel so pressured to do well in school I probably wouldn’t.’

“The second group consisted of the out-and-out opportunists.

– ” ‘I would cheat because I am trying to secure my grade so colleges would want me.’

– ” ‘If I’m failing the course and I need a good grade to graduate, then yes, I would cheat.’

– ” ‘I would cheat because why not? It hurts nobody and the only outcome is a better grade for myself which boosts my chances for better future.’

“Most of the non-cheaters – about 20 percent of the classes – were less concerned about ethical matters than dealing with the emotional negatives caused by the dishonesty.

– ” ‘I wouldn’t cheat because I know myself well enough to know that paranoia would eat me alive.’

– ” ‘No, I would not be able to cheat because it would make me feel so guilty. I have enough stomach pains without doing something like this that would cause even more.’
– ” ‘I would not cheat … because I would feel terrible and I also happen to have a loud, strong conscience derived from years of Catholic school.’

– ” ‘Frankly I don’t think I would cheat. Cheating brings stress and fear and just makes you feel like a total piece of crap. There is no sense of pride when you do well on a test you’ve cheated on.’

“My own solution to the cheating problem, at least in my high school courses, is to give no exams, no tests and no homework. That’s about as pressure-free as I can make it. My classes are based on discussion, not lectures. Speak coherently, listen well to others, parry politely with whom you disagree, have the courage of your convictions but, better, the courage to challenge them: Do that and a decent grade is assured. As well as a clear conscience.”

Colman’s commentary got me thinking: What have I learned since my time in college when I so easily rationalized my own cheating?

I’ve learned that it’s easier to be cynical than to be honest; easy to be swept up by the amorality that everybody lies and cheats to get the grade, win the game, get the contract, get ahead, whatever your needs are at any given moment, because… you’ve got a mortgage to pay, kids in college, have to meet a deadline, or the teacher is over-the-top boring.

What I’ve learned since college is that compromising my integrity is not an option; that honesty and integrity requires hard work, and serious reflection on the kind of person I want to be. Ultimately, it requires the consciousness and commitment to doing the right thing, even when it costs more than I want to pay.

That is not to say that I am perfect. I’m not.

I’m still capable of sticking both feet in my mouth and talking at the same time, or telling lies of convenience and rationalizing them away because the truth would be too uncomfortable. It’s just that now, I take more time to think about the consequences of my actions before I open my mouth. I strive to be honest and responsible for my actions.

I do so not to impress family or friends, but for the peace of mind it gives me that at the end of the day I can say, I did my best. That’s all I can do. That’s all any of us can do.


Leave a Comment

Read More Articles
The Latest... And Sometimes Greatest
Conscience of the Senate
Continued from Tuesday’s commentary, I offer two Senate leaders from the past. Tuesday, I spoke of the integrity of Republican John Williams. Today, I offer...
April 12, 2024
A Long Time Ago in a Washington Far, Far Away. . .
. . . two U.S. Senators, one Republican, one Democrat, showed us the meaning of duty and character. Republican John Williams, a chicken farmer and...
April 9, 2024
This is The America I Know
We Americans have many grave problems to solve, many threatening evils to fight, and many deeds to do, if, as we hope and believe, we...
April 5, 2024
We Need Moments Like This
Embed from Getty Images Let’s face it, we’re a mess. We’re living moment to moment, crisis to crisis at home and abroad. Every time you...
April 2, 2024
We’ve Become Morally Complacent
My 90-year-old father was a Reagan Republican. When I told him that I was going to call to say hello to my uncle Don (his...
March 26, 2024
My Declaration of Conscience
If I were a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, this would be my address to members. Mr. Speaker, Members of the House: We...
March 21, 2024