Rights vs. Responsibilities

Published: March 26, 2010

By Jim Lichtman
Image
Read More

The level to which anger-driven passion has risen in recent days has become yet another example of individuals who feel that their right to challenge any issue allows them to act in ways that are appallingly irresponsible.

From Representative Neugebauer shouting “baby killer” during a House session to the bricks thrown through the windows of political headquarters, the anger demonstrated by many has escalated from heated rhetoric to threats of violence.

Sadly, some people are so focused on rights that they forget about the corresponding responsibilities.  The right to free speech carries with it the responsibility to speak in a civil manner. The right to march in protest carries with it the responsibility to do so in a peaceful and respectful way.

The ethical value of responsibility, ethicist Michael Josephson affirms, “is about our ability to respond to circumstances and to choose the attitudes, actions, and reactions that shape our lives.”

Too many people have chosen to not only ignore common sense but common decency.

How can we claim to be “the land of the free” when individuals declare that their right to free speech includes calling a black congressman n****r?  Where is the exercise of responsibility for “the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” when people curse and spit on another?

“Responsible people,” Josephson says, “not only depend on themselves but show others that they can be depended on. This breeds trust, and trust is a key that opens many doors.”

We need to demonstrate that kind of responsibility not only to each other, but more importantly, for the next generation of citizens.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Too many have fought and died for these principles and many more are fighting at this moment.

In his book, Man’s Search for Meaning, Holocaust survivor Viktor Frankl recommended that “the Statue of Liberty on the East Coast should be supplemented by a Statue of Responsibility on the West Coast.” His idea was that “Freedom is only part of the story and half of the truth. Freedom is but the negative aspect of the whole phenomenon whose positive aspect is responsibleness. In fact, freedom is in danger of degenerating into mere arbitrariness unless it is lived in terms of responsibleness.”

It’s time for all of us to act responsibly and be the example we wish for our kids.

Comments

Leave a Comment



Read More Articles
The Latest... And Sometimes Greatest
It Was Important Then. It is Important Today
Freedom of speech in America is under attack, not only when people are denied the right to speak, but when lies, intimidation and the deliberate...
August 3, 2026
When Political Identity Replaces Ethical Judgment
The political and cultural landscape has become a minefield of conflicting beliefs, many now rooted less in public policy than in personal identity. One of...
July 31, 2026
Principles Matter.
A few nights ago, I was watching The Way We Were, a film I’ve seen more times than I can count. This time, a single...
July 28, 2026
All the President’s Men 2.0
“Politics had infiltrated every corner of government—a strong-arm takeover of the agencies by the Nixon White House.” —Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, All the President’s...
July 23, 2026
The Threat to November Is Already Here
“Cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government.”—George Washington’s...
July 20, 2026
Jon Ossoff and the Conscience of Atticus Finch
I’ve written about Georgia Senator Jon Ossoff before, but after watching his questioning of Jay Clayton, President Trump’s nominee for director of national intelligence (DNI),...
July 17, 2026