August 2013 Ethical Hero – Howard Schultz

Published: August 12, 2013

By Jim Lichtman
Image
Read More

I have never posted the same “Ethical Hero” twice. Howard Schultz is the exception.

Starbucks Chairman, President and CEO Howard Schultz has never shied away from controversial issues. Nor has he shamelessly pandered to his customer base. He has, in fact, embraced two words that are in short supply today: Common Sense.

In 2011, frustrated with Washington politics, Schultz sent out a company-wide e-mail expressing his frustration over “the lack of cooperation and irresponsibility among elected officials as they have put partisan agendas before the people’s agenda.”

Schultz stressed to employees that “to earn our customers’ trust by being respectful of their own life situations — whatever it may be.”

Ultimately, he called on corporations to ban all political contributions to both parties until they grasp the fact that they work for the people, not the party, special interest or their own particular agenda.

“Earlier this year,” The Associated Press reported that Starbucks “banned smoking within 25 feet of its stores, wherever its leases allowed. The idea was to extend its no-smoking policy to the outdoor seating areas, regardless of state laws on the matter.

“At the company’s annual meeting in March, a shareholder stood to criticize Starbucks’ support of marriage equality. Schultz told the man it was a free country and that he could sell his shares.”

When I opened today’s New York Times (Sept. 19), there he was, again – Schultz was taking another stand for the sake of respect and responsibility:

Dear Fellow Americans,

Few topics in America generate a more polarized and emotional debate than guns. In recent months, Starbucks stores and our partners (employees) who work in our stores have been thrust unwillingly into the middle of this debate. That’s why I am writing today with a respectful request that customers no longer bring firearms into our stores or outdoor seating areas.

From the beginning, our vision at Starbucks has been to create a ‘third place’ between home and work where people can come together to enjoy the peace and pleasure of coffee and community. Our values have always centered on building community rather than dividing people, and our stores exist to give every customer a safe and comfortable respite from the concerns of daily life.

We appreciate that there is a highly sensitive balance of rights and responsibilities surrounding America’s gun laws, and we recognize the deep passion for and against the ‘open carry’ laws adopted by many states. (In the United States, ‘open carry’ is the term used for openly carrying a firearm in public.) For years we have listened carefully to input from our customers, partners, community leaders and voices on both sides of this complicated, highly charged issue.

Our company’s longstanding approach to ‘open carry’ has been to follow local laws: we permit it in states where allowed and we prohibit it in states where these laws don’t exist. We have chosen this approach because we believe our store partners should not be put in the uncomfortable position of requiring customers to disarm or leave our stores. We believe that gun policy should be addressed by government and law enforcement – not by Starbucks and our store partners.

Recently, however, we’ve seen the ‘open carry’ debate become increasingly uncivil and, in some case, even threatening. Pro-gun activists have use our stores as a political stage for media events misleadingly called ‘Starbucks Appreciation Days’ that disingenuously portray Starbucks as a champion of ‘open carry.’ To be clear: we do not want these events in our stores. Some anti-gun activists have also played a role in ratcheting up the rhetoric and friction, including soliciting and confronting our customers and partners.

For these reasons, today we are respectfully requesting that customers no longer bring firearms into our stores or outdoor seating areas – even in states where ‘open carry’ is permitted – unless they are authorized law enforcement personnel.

I would like to clarify two points. First, this is a request and not an outright ban. Why? Because we want to give responsible gun owners a chance to respect our request – and also because enforcing a ban would potentially require our partners to confront armed customers, and that is not a role I am comfortable asking Starbucks partners to take on. Second, we know we cannot satisfy everyone. For those who oppose ‘open carry,’ we believe the legislative and policy-making process is the proper arena for this debate, not our stores. For those who champion ‘open carry,’ please respect that Starbucks stores are places where everyone should feel relaxed and comfortable. The presence of a weapon in our stores is unsettling and upsetting for many of our customers.

I am proud of our country and our heritage of civil discourse and debate. It is in this spirit that we make today’s request. Whatever your view, I encourage you to be responsible and respectful of each other as citizens and neighbors.

Sincerely,

Howard Schultz

Congratulations, Howard. You continue to be a thoughtful, and well-reasoned breath of fresh air that the country needs more of.

Comments

Leave a Comment



Read More Articles
The Latest... And Sometimes Greatest
I Met a Traveler in An Antique Land
I time-tunneled back to 460 BC to have a conversation with Socrates, the renowned Greek sage, about the greatest challenges we face today. With the...
December 2, 2024
Thanksgiving: A Harvest of Hope
In a Thanksgiving address given in 1944 at London’s Royal Albert Hall, and in the presence of  Winston Churchill, United States Ambassador John Gilbert Winant...
November 27, 2024
The Power of Kindness
CBS News journalist Steve Hartman has built a career on finding the extraordinary within the ordinary. At a time when headlines are dominated by division...
November 25, 2024
Harmony of Hope
Running errands, stuck in traffic, cut off in traffic, crawling through traffic, frustrated and angry while enduring a relentless stream of bad news droning on...
November 21, 2024
Good Night, and Good Luck
“You tried to destroy Trump; you tried to imprison Trump; you tried to break Trump. He’s not breakable. You couldn’t destroy him, and now he...
November 18, 2024
What Would Nixon Say?
What began as a commentary about team Trump’s missed deadline to submit an ethics code—a legally required document meant to reassure the public about transparent...
November 15, 2024