The Wrong Stuff

Published: October 19, 2009

By Jim Lichtman
Read More

Last Monday (Oct. 12) I brought up the ethical issue facing Charles Rangel, the House Democrat from New York.

Mr. Rangel has been under investigation for the past year regarding some questionable financial reporting. Recently, The House Ethics Committee has expanded their investigation into Mr. Rangel’s failure to “…report hundreds of thousands of dollars in income and assets from 2002 through 2006,” The New York Times reported (Oct. 9).

Until the issue is resolved, many – notably Republicans – are calling for Rangel to step down as chairman of the powerfulWays & Means Committee.  Several have come to his defense – notably Democrats. However, Republican Representative Peter King said, “I think it is a dangerous precedent to find someone guilty before the ethics committee has made a decision.”

Rangel’s lawyers claim that their client’s financial problems are more the result of “sloppy bookkeeping” than deliberate fraud.

So, should Rangel step down until the Ethics Committeecompletes its investigation or is Rangel innocent until proven guilty?

I consulted the most immediate source:  the 2008 edition ofThe House Ethics Manual by the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct. After you scroll through a rather lengthy and detailed table of contents and appendices, An Overview of General Ethical Standards (page 1) reads: “Members, officers and employees of the House should: Conduct themselves at all times in a manner that reflects creditably on the House.”

However, the top of page two addresses the issue even more clearly with a quote from former Speaker of the House Henry Clay: “Government is a trust, and the officers of the government are trustees; and both the trust and the trustees are created for the benefit of the people.”

I would ask Mr. Rangel’s attorneys two questions: Does Mr. Rangel’s behavior reflect “creditably on the House”?  Is he living up to the trust of the American people?

“Ethics,” ethicist and teacher Michael Josephson says, “is having the character and the courage to do the right thing, even when it costs more than you want to pay.”

With trust and confidence in elected officials at an all-time low, I believe Mr. Rangel knows the right thing to do, but it would seem the price is too high.


P.S.:  Is it me, or do both Rangel and Florida State University President T.K. Wetherell (see “Rogue Tutors”) use a lot of hand gestures when explaining themselves?




Leave a Comment

Read More Articles
The Latest... And Sometimes Greatest
It’s Called Citizenship, Mr. Trump
Even as former President Donald Trump finds himself facing 4 criminal indictments, his hardcore supporters continue to parrot his false accusations that the charges against...
August 17, 2023
Fantasy Island
Wasn’t that the fantasy/drama show from the 70s? Welcome to Fantasy Island, the reality show in Washington, DC. On the South side of the island,...
August 11, 2023
We Are All Americans
Last week’s arraignment of former President Donald Trump was unprecedented in many ways. I contacted retired journalist Bob Wilson to interview some of the individuals...
August 8, 2023
What Republicans Can Do To Salvage Their Immortal Souls
He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against...
August 3, 2023
A Message of Hope
Attending to my 98-year-old father after a fall, I was leaving the hospital when I came across this message posted in an elevator. With America...
July 19, 2023
Character? What’s That?
“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.”—Edmund Burke, Anglo-Irish statesman,...
July 14, 2023