All Lies Matter

Courtesy Dan Piraro – Bizarro.com

Since June 2015, when he first announced his candidacy, Donald Trump has proven himself to be the most dismissive, divisive, defensive, histrionic, ill-tempered, sexist, Islamaphobic, bigoted, blame-laying, responsibility-evading, transparency-avoiding, media-needy, media-hating (except for stories about him that he likes), contradictory, federal judge-denouncing, Fake News-claiming, science-denying, historically illiterate, constitutionally ignorant, conspiracy-promoting, demagogic, fear-mongering, ally-alienating, NATO-naïve, authoritarian-leaning, Putin-praising, murderous-dictators-admiring (Korea’s Kim Jung Un and Philippines President Duterte), China flip-flopping, inarticulate, confusing (and confused), internationally embarrassing individual to ever hold the highest elected office in U.S. history, who is so self-absorbed, he makes Narcissus, look like Pope Francis.

And when it comes to ethics?

Donald J. Trump holds the record for the most falsehoods, (technical ethics jargon for “lies”), by any candidate or president to ever hold office. In 2015, FactCheck crowned Trump “King of Whoppers.” Washington Post Fact Checker Glenn Kessler writes that Trump “…earned 59 Four-Pinocchio ratings [their highest negative] during his campaign as president. Since then, he’s earned 16 more Four-Pinocchios.”

And of 402 statements Trump made and checked by Politifact, only 16 percent were rated True or Mostly True.

If Hillary Clinton was guilty of moral hubris for maintaining a private e-mail server, and accepting foreign contributions to The Clinton Foundation from countries with human rights violations, Donald Trump is unashamedly appalling in his total disregard of anything approaching ethical integrity. Even Trump’s so-called charitable giving has been revealed as mostly sham.

But this commentary is not about the elephant in the room. It’s about the 96 percent who still support the elephant. This, despite the fact, that he hasn’t come close to achieving anything in his “100-day plan to Make America Great Again.”

Nonetheless, 96 percent of Trump’s base say they not only support the president but would vote for him again; most believing whatever comes out of his Twitter-mouth including his drumbeat of “Fake News” directed at any media outlet that has the temerity to point out inconsistencies and falsehoods.

There’s a name for this condition. It’s called “calculated ignorance.”

According to James Shepperd, PhD, Professor of Psychology at the University of Florida, Gainesville, “Calculated ignorance is when we avoid information we don’t want to hear. We might avoid information that threatens to darken our mood—why watch the nightly news if it’s just going to make us angry? Or information that calls one of our cherished beliefs into question—if we think of ourselves as smart, we might ignore evidence that we’ve done something dumb.”

While the condition usually applies to individuals with health issues, I can easily see a crossover to politics where those afflicted choose to ignore information contrary to their own beliefs.

Shepperd offers tips to overcome such calculation, along with my own ethical guidelines.

“Consider ways in which you have some control. If you are afraid you have no control over the situation, think about other aspects of your life where you are in control. A sense of control seems to make us more willing to confront difficult facts. One recent study found that women were significantly less likely to avoid learning the odds that they would get breast cancer if they first read about breast cancer risk factors that were within their control, rather than about learning about uncontrollable risks for the disease.”

From an ethical standpoint: assess information from several sources instead of one or two. Check the reliability of those sources. There are no “alternative” facts. Opinion is not fact. It is a belief or judgment that rests on insufficient grounds to produce complete certainty.  A fact is defined as “something that actually exists; reality; truth.”

“Consider what you value most deeply. This might be your family, your work ethic, your sense of fair play or anything else that’s at the core of your value system or the top of your list of life priorities. Recount things you have done recently that reflect these values and priorities. Studies suggest that focusing on core values and priorities decreases information avoidance, perhaps because it makes the information being avoided seem trivial in comparison.”

From an ethical standpoint: Understand that while one may be loyal to a political party or individual there are limitations to loyalty especially when there are violations of fairness, honesty and integrity.

“Consider why you are avoiding the information. Sometimes we avoid information because our fears are operating on autopilot. Thinking through why we are doing this can shut off the autopilot and put us back in control.”

From an ethical standpoint: forget party politics for a moment; take a cold, hard look at the individual or group you are supporting. Is that individual or group magnifying your fears? Are those fears out-of-line with rational thought?

Beliefs and opinions form the basis of our thought patterns. But if they become irrational we can quickly become cynical and view all people through a negative lens which leads to narrow-minded thinking.

All lies matter, especially the ones we tell ourselves.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on LinkedInEmail this to someoneShare on RedditShare on Tumblr

2 comments… add one

  • Dr. David Inman May 5, 2017, 9:34 am

    Once again Jim a great well written article. Unfortunately politics is crooked to say the least and its on both sides of the aisle. The Democratic Party blew it by running Hillary Clinton and all her baggage. Remember Debbie Wasserman-Shultz conspiring to sabotage Senator Bernie Sanders. Donna Brazile leaking questions to the Hillary Camp before a debate. Its pathetic these things happen but neither side is immune to it. Half truths in politics are rampant; remember our former President Obama told the American people they would NOT lose access to their doctor, oops millions did.

    I am not disputing that POTUS Trump has said half truths, but what I am focusing on is our economy April jobs +211,000, unemployment rate falls to 4.4% 10 year low, 153,156,000 employed 3rd straight record S&P 500 has rallied 5.5% since the inauguration the third best performance since world war 2.

    I love reading your website keep up the great professional work you do Mr. Lichtman

  • Dr. John N. Baldwin FACS May 5, 2017, 11:05 pm

    I was heartened to see “a comment” from an intelligent and devoted follower such as Dr. Inman, recalling my comment a few weeks ago, “Hey, where are the comments? Is everybody dead or just in coma?”

    Thanks, Dave. And agree. For me, personality is irrelevant…results will matter and it is too early to judge, but Jim let it fly…as in, “Hey Jim, Tell us how you really feel!” To be precise, the America of today is beyond the comprehension of my years: driverless cars, finger rings that control home electronics, gender funny bathrooms and “safe-spaces” totally foreign to this 50’s teen who rode in cars without seat-belts, had a crib with lead paint, a home with asbestos insulation and two parents. I stick this to illustrate just how nuts we are (and cannot come back)…a headline over an article by Harvard and MIT researchers in the Journal of Microbiology: Just when you think you’ve heard it all, you discover YOU HAVEN’T. “Scientists conclude eating nose pick is good for the immune system.” Yes, they said it, and whatever Jim says about Trump can only be taken “in the context that everyone else is ‘normal.'” The whole place is NUTS.

Leave a Comment