Rights vs. Responsibilities

Published: March 26, 2010

By Jim Lichtman
Image
Read More

The level to which anger-driven passion has risen in recent days has become yet another example of individuals who feel that their right to challenge any issue allows them to act in ways that are appallingly irresponsible.

From Representative Neugebauer shouting “baby killer” during a House session to the bricks thrown through the windows of political headquarters, the anger demonstrated by many has escalated from heated rhetoric to threats of violence.

Sadly, some people are so focused on rights that they forget about the corresponding responsibilities.  The right to free speech carries with it the responsibility to speak in a civil manner. The right to march in protest carries with it the responsibility to do so in a peaceful and respectful way.

The ethical value of responsibility, ethicist Michael Josephson affirms, “is about our ability to respond to circumstances and to choose the attitudes, actions, and reactions that shape our lives.”

Too many people have chosen to not only ignore common sense but common decency.

How can we claim to be “the land of the free” when individuals declare that their right to free speech includes calling a black congressman n****r?  Where is the exercise of responsibility for “the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” when people curse and spit on another?

“Responsible people,” Josephson says, “not only depend on themselves but show others that they can be depended on. This breeds trust, and trust is a key that opens many doors.”

We need to demonstrate that kind of responsibility not only to each other, but more importantly, for the next generation of citizens.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Too many have fought and died for these principles and many more are fighting at this moment.

In his book, Man’s Search for Meaning, Holocaust survivor Viktor Frankl recommended that “the Statue of Liberty on the East Coast should be supplemented by a Statue of Responsibility on the West Coast.” His idea was that “Freedom is only part of the story and half of the truth. Freedom is but the negative aspect of the whole phenomenon whose positive aspect is responsibleness. In fact, freedom is in danger of degenerating into mere arbitrariness unless it is lived in terms of responsibleness.”

It’s time for all of us to act responsibly and be the example we wish for our kids.

Comments

Leave a Comment



Read More Articles
The Latest... And Sometimes Greatest
The Conscience of Government
If I had my way, every candidate who wins a primary election for public office—from Congress to the presidency—would be required to pass through a...
July 24, 2025
Are We Asking the Right Questions?
A recent graduation speech by a young philosophy major, Clair Doyle, at Northwestern University in Illinois, began with a deceptively simple question that stopped me...
July 21, 2025
When Power Rewrote the Message
When the pulpit merges with power, does the sword overshadow the Sermon on the Mount? Though I’m no longer practicing, I was raised Catholic. I...
July 17, 2025
It’s Superman, Strange Visitor from Another Planet…
Superman—America’s original superhero—once stood tall as a symbol of everything this country aspired to be. Superman—who embodies courage, decency, and fairness. Superman—who fights for the...
July 14, 2025
What J.D. Vance No Longer Stands For
Once celebrated as the thoughtful author of Hillbilly Elegy, Vance’s rise to the vice presidency is a lesson in political transformation—and not for the better....
July 11, 2025
Waiting for Mr. Smith
It may seem obvious, but it couldn’t be more urgent: we need about a thousand Mr. Smiths in Washington right now. We need the idealism,...
July 7, 2025